Research & Evidence
Our coaching, professional learning, and wellness practices are grounded in peer-reviewed research. Below we map each area of our work to the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) evidence tiers and provide the curated reference list that informs our approach — so school and district leaders can evaluate the evidence base with confidence.
The Every Student Succeeds Act defines four tiers of evidence for educational interventions. Many districts can only use Title II and other federal funds for professional learning that meets a defined tier.
Supported by one or more well-designed and well-implemented experimental studies (randomized controlled trials) showing a statistically significant positive effect.
Supported by one or more well-designed and well-implemented quasi-experimental studies showing a statistically significant positive effect.
Supported by one or more well-designed and well-implemented correlational studies with statistical controls for selection bias.
Supported by a well-specified logic model informed by research, with a planned effort to study the program's effectiveness over time.
Each area of our work is mapped to the strongest supporting evidence tier, with the key references that inform our practice.
School-based universal SEL interventions show significant positive effects on academic achievement, social-emotional skills, and reduced conduct problems — the strongest evidence base underlying our classroom and culture work.
Key References
Meta-analyses of mindfulness-based interventions with youth and educators show moderate positive effects on well-being, attention, and reduced psychological distress, including in teacher-specific programs.
Key References
Meta-analyses of interventions targeting educator burnout show moderate effects, particularly for individual-focused and organizational approaches — the foundation of our coaching and systemic burnout work.
Key References
Randomized controlled trials of Mindful Self-Compassion programs show significant effects on well-being and reduced self-criticism, supporting our self-compassion practices and reflections.
Key References
Meta-analyses of self-regulation and executive function interventions in educational settings show moderate effects on academic outcomes and self-regulated learning.
Key References
Controlled studies of slow, regulated breathing and heart rate variability biofeedback show promising effects on stress reduction and autonomic regulation — the physiological basis for our breathwork practices.
Key References
Emerging correlational and quasi-experimental research supports trauma-informed and trauma-sensitive school approaches for educator practice and school climate.
Key References
Correlational research with statistical controls links educator well-being, teacher–student relationship quality, and classroom outcomes — informing our coaching and school culture work.
Key References
Polyvagal theory and autonomic regulation research provide the theoretical logic model informing our nervous-system-informed practices. We are building toward internal study of our own program outcomes.
Key References
This reference list is curated and updated regularly as the research base evolves. It is intended to help school and district leaders evaluate the evidence informing our work; it is not a claim that every Center for Thriving program has been independently evaluated. We are building toward internal outcome study of our own cohorts and coaching participants. Questions about the evidence base? Email us at center4thriving@gmail.com.